![]() ![]() However that's the case for any milsurp out there under the sun. The fact that your crest and date are apparently missing raises the question of originality for your s/n. However, that is not to say any one individual rifle of the type does not have headspace problems or other flaws. 1 1 - 20 of 25 Posts 1 2 Next geladen 2 (Edited by Moderator) Your serial number, if original, would indicate a very early first year of production Oviedo 1896. The basic conversion as done, with the small ring Mauser action is SOUND for full 7.62 NATO. 308 Enfields since before there was a worldwide web on rec.guns and mail lists. And the same misinformation has been bouncing around the net over the Civil Gaurdia rifles, Israeli converted Mausers, and the FR-7 and FR-8, and the Indian Ishapore. White labs has tested some of the Spanish Civil Gaurdia Mausers to failure only after a proof load that was several times SAMMI. While 7.62 may or may not have seen use in second-line converted Mausers, they were converted for full 7.62 NATO and nothing else. ![]() (much like Japnese 7.62x51 for their MBR)ħ.62 CTME is dimensionally identical to 7.62 NATO and was only developed to aid in full-auto controlability. However, it is loaded at much lower pressure. 308ħ.62 CETME is very much dimensionally similar to. I believe that was actually for 7.62 CETME cartridge and not. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |